Monday, December 3, 2007

Memo to the BCS

To: Acting BCS President; BCS Conference Commissioners, BCS Conference AD’s, BCS Conference School Presidents

From: Dav

Re: Winter Madness

Here are my findings from our 11/19 meeting in which you put me on retainer to find a solution to the quagmire that is major college football. After a full review of past history, financial implications and the burdens on our student-athletes, I’m ready to put forth for your consideration a proposal – a ten team playoff dubbed Winter Madness.

Consider the current BCS Standings.

The top ten teams are:

  1. Ohio State (Big Ten Champ)
  2. LSU (SEC Champ)
  3. Virginia Tech (ACC Champ)
  4. Oklahoma (Big 12 Champ)
  5. Georgia (SEC At Large)
  6. Missouri (Big 12 At Large)
  7. USC (PAC 10 Champ)
  8. Kansas (Big 12 At Large)
  9. West Virginia (Big East Champ)
  10. Hawaii (WAC At Large)

Opening Round:

You asked me to preserve the importance of the regular season. In meeting this goal, conference champions will be afforded a first round bye in Winter Madness. The opening round of Winter Madness will be the third Saturday in December, after first semester final exams have concluded. These games will be home game sites for the higher ranked team. This year, #5 Georgia will host #10 Hawaii and #6 Missouri will host #8 Kansas, on Saturday, December 15th.

The two losers will be placed into the Cotton and the Outback New Year’s Day Bowls, based on a pre-determined selection order.

The winners will move on to the next Round.

Round of Eight:

You asked me to preserve the importance of the four BCS bowls. In a rotating order, the four BCS bowls will have their selection in choosing the matchup they would most want to host. Assuming the favored hosts win in the play-in round, the round of eight would look like this:

  1. #1 Ohio State v. #9 West Virginia (Rose)
  2. #2 LSU v. #7 USC (Sugar)
  3. #3 VaTech v. #6 Missouri (Fiesta)
  4. #4 Oklahoma v. #5 Georgia (Orange)

I would bet that the Rose would love to snatch up OSU, as they haven’t played in the Rose Bowl in ten full years. Additionally, perhaps the Sugar wants the local Tigers to fill the Superdome.

National Semifinals:

These games would be played on a rotating basis at two of the four BCS sites, held on the second Saturday after New Years Day. Every other year, rather than one year in four, would the four marquee bowls get to host of game of national importance. You asked me to respect the schedules of the student athletes. National Semifinals will conclude before the start of second semesters. My predictions in the above games would be as follows:

  1. #9 West Virginia v. #4 Oklahoma
  2. #2 LSU v. #6 Missouri

National Championship:

You asked me to create an event that would combine the passion of America's favorite tournament (March Madness) with America's favorite day (the SuperBowl). Ideally held during the bye week between the NFL Conference Championships and the SuperBowl, college football has its pinnacle event. Use the SuperBowl /Final Four model, rotating the game between warm weather destinations and stadiums fit to hold 60,000+ fans. Create a week for showcasing all that is good with college athletics.

  1. #4 Oklahoma v. #2. LSU

Additional points:

1. Cut the regular season down one (or even two) games. There is no reason that teams should play 12 regular season games.

2. Limit August practice substantially. With the new NCF season extending into mid January for a handful of teams, the start of the season should be moved back. Teams won’t have to be worried that an early season loss will kill their national title hopes.

3. When you do finally agree to set up this Winter Madness, agree to pay the architect, Dav, one-tenth of one percent of the television contract. With this, I will comfortably retire from professional work and bring my problem solving skills to the quagmire in the Middle East.

8 comments:

E-on said...

This is why I love you Dave.

Dav said...

How about the 2006 Season?

1. Ohio State (Big 10 Champ)
2. Florida (SEC Champ)
3. Michigan (Big 10 At Large)
4. LSU (SEC At Large)
5. USC (PAC 10 Champ)
6. Louisville (Big East Champ)
7. Wisconsin (Big 10 At Large)
8. Boise State (WAC At Large)
10. Oklahoma (Big 12 Champ)
14. Wake Forest (ACC Champ)

Opening Round:
#8 Boise State at #3 Michigan
#7 Wisconsin at #4 LSU

Round of 8:
#1 OSU v. #14 Wake Forest (Rose)
#2 Florida v. #10 Oklahoma (Orange)
#3 Michigan v. #6 Louisville (Sugar)
#4 LSU v.. #5 USC (Fiesta)

Nat’l Semifinals:
#1 OSU v. #4 LSU
#2 Florida v. #3 Michigan

Championship Game
#2 Florida v. #4 LSU

Lot of interesting matchups out there.

Flip said...

Excellent work, but the problem is with the bowls in the round of 8. they would have to accept 3 games over top of them instead of only 1. So as no to offend the big bowls, why not change it around a little. Make it a rotating system (They have already shown they are willing to rotate the years of their bowl being the big dog) and have the 4 majors alternate being the semifinals and top 2 final 8 games and fill in the rest with the next tier of bowls.
for example (see the parenthesis):
Opening Round:
#8 Boise State at #3 Michigan (sun bowl)
#7 Wisconsin at #4 LSU (Capital one)

Round of 8:
#1 OSU v. #14 Wake Forest (Sugar or other)
#2 Florida v. #10 Oklahoma (Orange or other)
#3 Michigan v. #6 Louisville (Cotton)
#4 LSU v.. #5 USC (Gator)

Nat’l Semifinals:
#1 OSU v. #4 LSU (Rose or Other)
#2 Florida v. #3 Michigan (Fiesta or other)

Championship Game
#2 Florida v. #4 LSU (BCS Champs)

See we maintain the integrity of the bowls while having the tournament.

We could take it to even a greater level by mimiking the D3 football playoff system which has a total of 31 games, which would fit nicely into our current Bowl System of 32 (aalthough international bowl should not count) and the whole thing could be done by the same weekend as it is done now. Just name all the games after current Bowls

http://www.d3football.com/playoffs/07/bracket.htm

Flip said...

I would break down the whole top 32 teams and say where they would go, but that would just be rediculous... although I do have some time

Hampton, Matthew A said...

I still think ten teams is entirely too many for a playoff. I'd cap it at 4, leave the regular season the way it is and tell Hawaii to blow.

Flip said...

would you tell them to rain-Blow?

i'm sorry

Phil said...

Hold on. This system has just as many problems, if not more, than the current system. First off, awarding byes to all the conference champions is great way to get less deserving teams deeper into the playoff. The bye idea would work if all conferences and all conference champions were created equal...but they're most certainly not.

Take for instance Missouri and Kansas this year. To get into the Big 12 title game, all they essentially had to do was win one game. And to win the Big 12 all it took was one game. Georgia had to navigate the SEC, the toughest division in the toughest conference in football, and while they fell short to LSU in the SEC title game, they have to play a first round game while Missouri and Kansas potentially could have rested. No byes say I.

Also, another problem is with Hawaii and Boise St. taking up an at-large spot. If they actually had earned it, then that would be great, but between them they played 1 BCS team (each played Washington) and Hawaii won and BSU lost. They get fat on lousy schedules and then essentially have a one-game playoff for the WAC championship with the winner being 11-1 or 12-0 and the loser being 10-2 or 11-1. It's a joke and an idictment of the voters that each team is ranked as high as they are (This will be a spin-off topic coming shortly--should mid-majors play tough schedules and go 7-5, 8-4 or easy schedules and go 11-1, 12-0).

Anyway, this playoff system won't work.

I see 2 alternatives:

A 16 team playoff with the 14 conference champs plus the 2 best non-champions. Create a seeding committee (just like basketball) to seed the teams 1 to 16 and then play it off. This way the regular season is still vitally important, the #1 team is rewarded for their excellence by getting the MAC, Sun Belt, CUSA conference champ in the first round, and so on. Bowl games can still be played between non-participating teams.

Or the other alternative is to not release any rankings until week 8 of the regular season and make sure the people who vote actually watch the games. This would make the rankings and BCS a lot more credible.

Phil said...

Holy brain-fart. The above post should be 11 conference champions with 5 at large teams. Still the same premise though.